Yep that's right! I am not going to hide the fact that I think Michael Jackson is the Poster-boy for NAMBLA. That a jury had reasonable doubt about his guilt is simply our great system at work.
Don't take this the wrong way, our system is designed to allow a man who molests children to 'get-off' so to speak if the jury members have any doubts about the guilt or innocence of the litigant. This is how our system was intended to work, this is how it worked yesterday. Bravo for those jurors who did their jobs.
Now, on the Michael. My gut tells me he molests children, he thinks he is a child and he doesn't see anything wrong with any of it. *in best Michael voice* "it's just milk and cookies and sleeping, everything is just beautiful."
Look, we, California in particular, have a problem seeing the guilt in celebs. But the writing is on the wall where Michael is concerned, any parent stupid enough to allow their child to "sleep" with Michael in the future, should be charged with child abuse.
Now, can we focus on important things in the world and let Michael fade into Neverland?
Posted by Oddybobo at June 14, 2005 09:33 AMHello Oddybobo :-)
I just googled NAMBLA. Wha?! I've seen it all now...
Posted by: Sally at June 14, 2005 02:52 PMI really didn't keep up with the arrest and aubsequent trial, but from what I was hearing, it seemed to me that he was guilty. Oddly enough, I didn't care when I saw that he was aquitted. Oh well, back to work.
Posted by: Two Dogs at June 14, 2005 08:45 PMHe should have a restraining order put against him from every kid in the world!
Posted by: Sissy at June 14, 2005 09:06 PMThe only thing I really would like to see is what evidence the DA presented and how it was presented along with what the Defense came up with. I want to know if the jury found reasonable doubt based on a lack of strength in the evidence or if the defense was able to cast enough reasonable doubt onto it.
Although I do agree with your assessment that Americans are hard pressed to find guilt in celebreties
Posted by: Contagion at June 15, 2005 08:42 AMFrom what I understand, the prosection's witnesses were incredibly weak.
Posted by: Harvey at June 15, 2005 09:46 AMOddybobo, I think you're being too harsh on Michael!! After all, this is the same man who said he would commit suicide if there were no more children to play with! He couldn't live if he had to play with himself!!!
Posted by: soundboyz at June 15, 2005 04:09 PMSoundboyz, you always make me laugh!
Posted by: Oddybobo at June 15, 2005 05:54 PMWhy do I think that A) This is not the last case involving MJ we will see, B) The man was not actually born in 1958, and C) He will be dead by 2015 regardless?
Posted by: The Babaganoosh at June 16, 2005 01:11 AMSun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
28 | 29 | 30 |