November 16, 2007

Always On

I'm a lawyer. I've struggled a lot to get to this point in my life. I'm a lawyer. It is my profession, but not who I am. So, I was surprised to hear my husband comment to me last night: "don't you ever shut it off? Are you always in Lawyer mode?"

Shocked I guess because he is right. I can logic - is that an action? - myself out of just about any situation. I've questions swirling through my head at all times. I can usually find the angle, the story, the hidden gem. I am always on.

So, the question du jour is this: Say one is permanently disabled and then that person gets a serious but not usually fatal illness. We will call it Pneumonia.

Treatment for a serious bout of pneumonia involves antibiotics and also possibly help breathing.

Now, say the person doesn't get any better after 4 weeks of treatment in intensive care for pneumonia. Still on a ventilator, still eating through a tube.

Ok, got it? Now, throw in the monkey wrench of a living will which provides no heroic measures, no resucitation. Being placed on the ventilator for a serious but not fatal illness isn't resucitation and was done with the understanding that the person would be well soon.

Ok, still with me? Now, say that person decides to end treatment for the pneumonia. That is an individual's right, isn't it? To end treatment for an illness.

Ahhh, another monkey wrench! Ending treatment may mean a slow, painful death from being unable to breathe because the lungs remain filled with fluid. Then again, it may not.

So, say the doctors end treatment but the lungs don't work and the patient needs resucitated - enter living will.

Ahhh, another monkey, another wrench - the doctor violates HIPPA by calling select family members and informing them of the decision of the patient to end treatment - thus causing the family to enter into a flurry of activity aimed at "gently" persuading said patient to change his mind. . .

Oh wait, did I tell you there were many monkeys at this particular garage?

Here's another, after ordering not one but two psych evaluations to prove mental instability - because really, who would want to die when all they have is pneumonia? The doctor announces to all present that he refuses to follow the patient's wishes because it would be "murder." Since when? If he was a Jehovah's Witness he could refuse treatments!

Oh, but the kicker, the blessed kicker - said patient is a tetraplegic. He has very limited use of his hands and has limited range of motion in his arms andno feeling from his breastbone down. He's been this way for over 20 years, has had two failed suicide attempts that have depleted him of yet more of his physical abilities - what little he had - including the ability to speak without souding like a smoker because of a tracheostomy tube.

After I've gone through all the legal scenarios, all the personal civil rights violations and also the indignity of it all, I come to this: God let him live through two attempts on his own life, he has played the hand he's been dealt - and we are at a crossroads. He has been shown an opportunity - to end medical treatment - the result being the possible end of his life - possible. Perhaps this was in his cards all along?

The problem? Family. Family - compassionate yet jarringly selfish. Content to watch him suffer, to make the obligatory holiday or illness visit, but not content to let a grown man of sound mind decide his own fate - take charge of his own health or lack thereof.

I struggle with the legal side of this potpouri of violations only to come to the realization that perhaps this was God's plan. And to wonder why I am not as selfish - my dear husband will lose an uncle, a father figure, his god father, his mother's twin. Why am I content to allow that to happen? To respect his dignity and his wishes? Is it the law - has it jaded me to human emotion? Certainly it isn't a lack of intimacy. I've known him for nearly 15 years. In 15 years I've seen him leave his bed only during the holidays. 15 years of bed sores, the inability to bath oneself, to brush one's teeth. 15 years of watching the world drive by through a picture window in an overwarm bedroom.

I watched as he struggled to bring a hand to my tiny son's head to brush away the whispy hairs. I watched as he watched the children run around the room longingly. I listened as he described how his cat would curl up on his hospital bed to keep him company in his tiny, stifling bedroom. 15 years of being able to feel pain but not being able to feel his legs. 15 years of a constant morphine drip that didn't dull anything but the senses.

Perhaps, I am jaded, but not because of the law. Because for 15 years I witnessed a struggle I would not wish on my worst enemy - ok, well, maybe my worst - or Hillary Clinton . . .

Next week, God willing, I'll say goodbye to a man who I have both pitied and admired. Next week, God willing. He'll say goodbye to the body-sack he has lived in for over 20 years.

I wonder, does it make me a bad person to want this for him?

Posted by Oddybobo at November 16, 2007 09:48 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Sometimes the law really is an ass. I hope he finds the peace that he deserves and that you wish for him.

Posted by: Jim - PRS at November 17, 2007 12:31 AM

No.

May he rest in peace, and you and yours rest easy...

Posted by: That 1 Guy at November 17, 2007 06:42 AM

The dichotomy between theory and practice is something of a monkey itself, at least for me. I sincerely hope your friend is left alone and able to die with dignity. It's what I would wish for myself.
Would I try to save my husband in that situation? Theoretically no. In practice that question might be much harder to answer.

Posted by: pam at November 17, 2007 07:29 AM

when my dad was dieing, he ended up in the ER and on life support because my mom was there and said yes ... put him on it. the next day she remembered his wishes and his living will and what she would want and had him taken off. a couple of days later he died. I do NOT think you are an arse nor wrong in seeing it from your point of view. It is the same view my family has. It is hard to let go but selfish to hang on to someone when that someone is ready to go.

Posted by: vw bug at November 17, 2007 09:56 AM

... what a horrible, horrible situation.... may he, you, and the rest of the family find peace....

Posted by: Eric at November 18, 2007 11:51 AM

We had to face the conundrum ourselves when they had to rush my mom from her little town hospital to Methodist.

See, she'd made it very clear she did not want to be hooked to a ventilator. Yet, the ventilator was just for support, because whatever she had she had a chance to recover.

I apologized to my mom for the decision, but I told her, in the same situation, We'd have to make the same decision...because the ventilation was only for temporary support... not long term.

Still, it was a sobering reminder of the decision my sister and I will have to make someday.

I think your family member has made his own informed decision and it should be honored, as my mom's would have been if the doctor had told us she would only live on a ventilator.

May he rest in peace and joy, free from pain.

Posted by: Nancy at November 19, 2007 01:24 AM

Hell no, your the only sane, reasonable person in your family right now.

You are respecting his wishes while the others are being selfish and don't want to go through the grieving process that will come, they want to save themselves the pain and by keeping him alive they can feel better about themselves.

Posted by: Quality Weenie at November 19, 2007 08:43 AM

I thought about this for quite a while and I conclude that Eric has the only answer I could even begin to give. May all of you find peace.

Posted by: Teresa at November 19, 2007 03:09 PM

what Joe said.

Posted by: caltechgirl at November 19, 2007 04:21 PM

You are most certainly NOT the bad guy here, Oddy.

Peace be with you all - the sooner the better.

Posted by: Richmond at November 19, 2007 06:02 PM

We went through that a few years ago with my husband's mother. She had had a colostomy bag for over a year from a previous surgery, and was trying to get it corrected with another surgery. (She had suffered terribly with the first surgery and hated the colostomy bag...who wouldn't!) She had to be on life support right after the surgery. We lived over 2000 miles away and couldn't talk to the doctors, and my husband's older sister talked their Dad into keeping Mom on life support despite her express wishes (the Living Will was invalid because Dad signed it as a witness even though we had told him it couldn't be that close of a relative in the state where they lived). Mom stayed on life support for a month, until my husband got his Dad convinced Mom didn't want to just be laying there. She died in less than 30 minutes after life support was removed. The older sister still blames us for their Mom's death...but it was just her selfishness. Mom wasn't living at all.

I don't think you're unfeeling. You just want what he wants for himself. Just be sure that the uncle has fluids if he lapses into a coma. Dehydration is a very painful way to die...slow and lingering. He has suffered enough as it is. God be with your family during this time.

Posted by: Mrs. Who at November 20, 2007 06:14 PM

If I was the patient and lived, I'd sue the hell out of the doctor, the hospital and all involved. I have a living will that I don't care if they know 100% that after 2 days I'd live, I never want to be hooked up to machines... ever. If I can't survive on my own, then I don't want to live.

Posted by: Contagion at November 20, 2007 06:39 PM

Happy Thanksgiving!

Posted by: vw bug at November 22, 2007 06:48 AM

Echoing VW!!!

Posted by: That 1 Guy at November 22, 2007 08:35 AM